ReasonedResponse.com

About ReasonedResponse

ReasonedResponse is the policy and opinion blog of Dave McClure. The longtime President and Chief Executive Officer of the U.S. Internet Industry Association (USIIA), Dave is an authority on complex policy, business, and legislative issues that impact the technology and online environment.

A technologist by education, Dave is also an accomplished pilot, judoka, Master Scuba Diver, oenologist and member of the legendary Scottish Clan McLeod.

Everything posted on this blog is my personal opinion and does not necessarily represent the views of the USIIA or its members.

Recommended Blogs

Recently in Environmental Tech Category

I grew up poor.

We didn't know we were poor, of course.  We thought everyone's dad had to work three jobs to pay the bills, and drive horrible old clunker cars that required constant work just to keep running.  But we were poor, and if there was a benefit to a lack of money it was that our technology-minded mother always had some startling new idea to save a few cents.

Which is how, in the Sixties, I ended up living in the only house I ever heard of in which the incandescent lights were all replaced by fluorescent bulbs.  At night, our house looked like a set from Night of the Living Dead, with human flesh cast in a ghastly pallor of fluorescence.

When President Bush signed into law a sweeping new energy bill last week -- the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, for those who want to look it up on Thomas -- I had flashbacks to that childhood. 

Overall, the bill is good tech.  It is not exactly the draconian intrusion into our personal lives that conservatives fear.  Neither is it the Great Leap Forward that many liberals wish it to be.  It is on balance a measured step toward new goals in a host of energy areas.  Automobiles and appliances will have goals to make them more energy-efficient over the next couple of decades.  Biofuels and energy alternatives get more research and seed money.  And incandescent light bulbs get new goals for energy consumption and life.

I doubt that means that most of us will be switching to those spiral fluourescents anytime soon.  The law does not actually ban incandescent light bulbs by 2012, despite the news reports claiming that.  And consumers have a legitimate beef with the harsh, grusesome light cast by these bulbs. (To put it another way, there's a reason why people put candles in their bedrooms, not fluorescent lights.  I personally believe that the rise of fluorescent bulbs in bedside reading lamps is one of the leading reasons the US birth rate has fallen in recent years.  "Not tonight, dear, you look like a frozen rotting corpse.")

What it does mean is that we will get better light bulbs.  Bulb makers that include market leader GE are hard at work trying to make fluorescentsmore attractive, but that is not the only technology under development.  And some of the new ideas will frankly outpace the fluorescents handily.  I suspect that just as LED lighting now dominates the flashlight industry, something will come along to save the lights in the living room.  In recent years, GE alone has experimented with bulbs that give a peach tint to a room, or blue.  Other companies are doing other things, and consumers will eventually move toward these new ideas if for no other reason than to escape the fluorescents.

Congress walks a funny line these days, caught between those who point out that the Constitution doesn't give them the right to regulate what light bulbs we use and those who demand environmental action right now.  Often, this line leaves Congress either doing nothing or doing the wrong thing.  But with the new energy bill, it looks like they are stepping gently in the right direction.

In my little corner of the world -- which is a small spread at the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia -- I'm constantly search for technologies that can make my life easier, cheaper or more productive.

With the winds gusting up to 60 miles an hour today, I resumed my search for information on how I could use wind power to supplant my ecological footprint and lessen my electric bill.  The news, alas, is not good.

There are a lot of good windmills on the market today, including some by PacWind that are smaller and more suitable for a home or small business.  Unfortunately, my place sits in a valley with steady state winds of only 5-6 miles per hour.  At that rate, a windmill would only produce about 90 kilowatt hours of energy against an average of 1200 kilowatt hours for a household.  At that rate, I would be long dead before recovering my investment.

I've already ruled out solar as a viable replacement -- too expensive, and still too inefficient.

Moving on to geothermal.  Will report progress.

Main Index

Search

Subscribe

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives